header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

No entry

Geoffrey Bindman QC recalls UK immigration in the 1960s

 

A report in The Guardian on 31 March 2012 headed “Anger over plan to x-ray young asylum seekers to check age” brought back memories of immigration and citizenship law in the 1960s. Until the case which I describe later, x-rays of young would-be immigrants from the Indian sub-continent were routinely performed. A practice condemned then should not be revived.
Restricted entry
Entry from the Commonwealth was first restricted by the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 (CIA 1962). No formal legal mechanism for challenging refusals of entry at airports existed. I got used to being summoned day and night to Heathrow by distraught family members whose loved ones were about to be returned to the sub-continent or East Africa. Children under 16 of those already settled in the UK were entitled to be admitted. CIA 1962 required the young person to satisfy the immigration officer that he or she was eligible. The absence of birth registration in parts of the sub-continent made this difficult.
The decision to admit or refuse was normally made by the immigration
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll