header-logo header-logo

21 June 2012 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7519 / Categories: Blogs
printer mail-detail

No entry

Geoffrey Bindman QC recalls UK immigration in the 1960s

 

A report in The Guardian on 31 March 2012 headed “Anger over plan to x-ray young asylum seekers to check age” brought back memories of immigration and citizenship law in the 1960s. Until the case which I describe later, x-rays of young would-be immigrants from the Indian sub-continent were routinely performed. A practice condemned then should not be revived.
Restricted entry
Entry from the Commonwealth was first restricted by the Commonwealth Immigrants Act 1962 (CIA 1962). No formal legal mechanism for challenging refusals of entry at airports existed. I got used to being summoned day and night to Heathrow by distraught family members whose loved ones were about to be returned to the sub-continent or East Africa. Children under 16 of those already settled in the UK were entitled to be admitted. CIA 1962 required the young person to satisfy the immigration officer that he or she was eligible. The absence of birth registration in parts of the sub-continent made this difficult.
The decision to admit or refuse was normally made by the immigration
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll