header-logo header-logo

22 September 2023
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Vicarious liability develops in trio of cases on limitation, historic asbestos exposure & foster care

138499

The ever-evolving area of vicarious liability is tackled in this week’s NLJ personal injury update. Vijay Ganapathy, partner, and Catriona Ratcliffe, associate solicitor, at Leigh Day, look at the legal developments and implications of three recent cases

The cases concern a local authority found not vicariously liable for sexual abuse reported by a child in care, a historic asbestos case where exposure took place in the 1960s, and a judgment giving guidance on limitation in a tragic case where a client was left ‘high and dry’ by her solicitors.

Ganapathy and Ratcliffe write: ‘The scope of vicarious liability has broadened as the courts have recognised the changing nature of employment and that numerous relationships can be ‘akin to employment’.’

Issue: 8041 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll