header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , ADR
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: The full implications of Churchill & why Halsey had to go

151503
Tony Allen, solicitor, mediator and senior consultant to CEDR, provides in-depth commentary on Churchill, which overturned Halsey, in this week’s NLJ

The overturning of Halsey, where it was held 18 years ago that for a court to order parties to mediate would infringe their Art 6 right to a fair trial, is a momentous occasion for dispute resolution lawyers.

Allen writes: ‘We can learn from facts that emerged from the appeal in Churchill where matters went somewhat astray in Halsey.’ He reflects on Halsey, ‘There is no doubt that the impact of this decision was widespread and profound. Courts that had been making ADR Orders—or said they wanted to—ceased to do so.’

Allen explores Churchill, examining questions raised and answered within the judgment by the Master of the Rolls. Finally, he looks at the future implications of this highly important case. 

Issue: 8053 / Categories: Legal News , ADR
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll