header-logo header-logo

NLJ this week: Expensive lawyers, costs reforms & language matters

19 April 2024
Issue: 8067 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Costs
printer mail-detail
168688
Happy birthday, Woolfians! It’s been 25 years since the arrival of the Civil Procedure Rules. In this week’s NLJ, Professor Dominic Regan, aka ‘The insider’, pays tribute to the Woolfian attribute of proportionality, and to the Lady Chief Justice (pictured), who 'oozes common sense'

Prof Regan goes on to note judicial incredulity over a silk and junior team who cleared £30,000 ‘for a two-hour Friday application’. He also reports on a talk he gave to district judges, and comments on some interesting judgments, including on the circumstances in which witness statements must be in the witness’s mother tongue. He warns: ‘This is a gaping trap for litigators. Beware.’

Issue: 8067 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Costs
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll