header-logo header-logo

19 April 2024 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 8067 / Categories: Opinion , In Court , Costs
printer mail-detail

The insider: 19 April 2024

168688
Dominic Regan brings good news for frustrated juniors, extols the wisdom of Woolf & Jackson, & admires the common-sense approach of the Lady Chief Justice

Are you a frustrated junior barrister fed up with those silks hogging the limelight? We bring you good tidings. The Supreme Court Practice Note of 7 March, issued by Lord Reed, bemoans the absence of junior counsel arguing issues before his court: ‘Experience in advancing oral argument is essential if junior counsel are to progress.’ Parties are encouraged to give junior counsel opportunities to advance oral arguments before the court.

The note accepts that this will not always be possible. From 9 April, the court expects to receive—alongside agreed speaking times—confirmation, in instances where juniors will not speak, that consideration has been given to whether they should be let loose. Incidentally, if I were a silk, I would hope the Supreme Court might issue a supplementary practice note asking if Ben Williams KC might relent and let others have a go. In the space of 41 days this year, he has won two appeals outright.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll