header-logo header-logo

25 March 2022
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: A passport from Pimlico plumbers?

75714
Pimlico Plumbers smoothes the path to back-dated holiday claims

The well-known plumbing firm, Pimlico Plumbers, lost its case on back-dated holiday claims, in the Court of Appeal. In this week’s NLJ, Charles Pigott, professional support lawyer, Mills & Reeve, writes that back-dated holiday pay claims from miscategorised workers will now be considerably easier to bring.

The decision also has implications for workers with historic claims for underpaid holidays.

In the case, Gary Smith’s £74,000 claim for accrued holiday pay, equating to four weeks each year for nearly six years, was upheld.

Pigott writes: ‘This latest ruling has clarified the rights of miscategorised workers in Mr Smith’s position but has also left a number of unanswered questions.’ These include, for example, the three-month gap rule, remedies available, and where to draw the line between unpaid and underpaid leave.

 

Issue: 7972 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll