header-logo header-logo

25 March 2022 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7972 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Holiday pay: broadening the horizons?

75714
Charles Pigott reports on a Court of Appeal ruling widening the scope for back-dated holiday pay claims
  • As a result of the latest ruling in the Pimlico Plumbers holiday pay dispute, back-dated claims from miscategorised workers will be considerably easier to bring.
  • The decision also has implications for workers with historic claims for underpaid holiday.

Gary Smith’s claim for accrued holiday pay was finally upheld by the Court of Appeal in February 2022 (Smith v Pimlico Plumbers Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 70, [2022] All ER (D) 11 (Feb)). The claim, valued at over £74,000, equates to four weeks’ holiday entitlement for each year of his engagement as a worker between August 2005 and May 2011.

Background

Mr Smith instituted proceedings in the employment tribunal in 2011, following the termination of his engagement with Pimlico Plumbers. He brought several claims, including for unpaid holiday entitlement, arguing that he was an employee, or alternatively a worker, and not a self-employed contractor as Pimlico Plumbers maintained.

At a preliminary hearing in 2012, the employment tribunal determined he was a worker,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll