header-logo header-logo

28 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Health , Compensation
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Vicarious liability, refusal of tests & dog bites during a police chase

209436
Recent caselaw on vicarious liability, quantum and the process of seeking permission for a civil claim for injuries occurring while committing an imprisonable offence for which the potential claimant was later convicted, are all discussed in NLJ’s personal injury update column this week. Vijay Ganapathy, partner at Leigh Day specialising in industrial disease and complex injury cases, explores the issues in each case.

Can a claimant seek damages from the police for injuries sustained at the jaws of a police dog when he was apprehended? Should a claim be stayed unless the claimant undergoes medical testing? Was a local authority vicariously liable for abuse perpetrated by a foster carer related to the victim?

Ganapathy looks at the range of legal areas involved—the two-stage test, determining quantum and s 329, Criminal Justice Act 2003. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll