header-logo header-logo

21 March 2025
Issue: 8109 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Practical advice when advising on AI compliance

211928
Regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) is a hot topic, particularly as the UK and EU pursue their own distinct approaches

In this week’s NLJ, Bamdad Shams, professor of management practice in business law at ESSEC Business School and a lawyer at the Paris Bar, sets out some practical strategies for legal advisers.

The stakes are high—the penalties for non-compliance with the EU AI Act include fines of up to €35m or 7% of global annual turnover. Lawyers must ensure businesses maintain detailed documentation and are prepared for audits.

Shams writes: ‘Navigating these differing regulations is essential for businesses employing AI in both jurisdictions. They may encounter stricter EU documentation requirements while addressing sector-specific issues with UK regulators. Additionally, the UK’s focus on transparency and algorithmic bias aligns with [President Emmanuel] Macron’s vision, but may face challenges fitting within broader EU initiatives.’ 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll