header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: No duty to warn—even when danger is clear

225839
Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group examines the Court of Appeal’s ruling in Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, where police were found not liable for failing to warn a domestic abuse victim of an imminent attack

Despite a neighbour’s 999 call reporting the assailant lurking outside, no warning was given—and minutes later, the victim was stabbed. The court held that public authorities are generally not liable for omissions, reaffirming the precedent set in Michael.

Davey explores the Tofaris exceptions—such as assumption of responsibility or control over the danger—but finds none applied. He argues the law is ripe for reform, noting that a simple phone call could have prevented the attack. The decision, he warns, may erode public confidence in policing and justice.

An appeal is pending, and the legal community is watching closely.

Issue: 8125 / Categories: Legal News , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll