header-logo header-logo

18 July 2025 / Charles Davey
Issue: 8125 / Categories: Features , Tort , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Call of duty?

225839
Charles Davey reports on the police’s duty of care to warn domestic abuse victims of an imminent attack
  • Examines the facts of Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock, in which it was found that the police have no duty of care to warn potential victims of danger.

By way of background to Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police v Woodcock [2025] EWCA Civ 13, Mrs W had been in an ‘on-off’ relationship with RG for two years. During that time, Mrs W had made complaints of threats by RG to kill her, RG was convicted of head-butting Mrs W’s husband, and RG had received repeated harassment warnings. RG went on to breach bail conditions on multiple occasions.

On 4 February 2015, Mrs W ended the relationship. She reported that RG had made threats of serious violence to her, her young son and daughter. In that month, RG was ejected from Mrs W’s workplace and arrested for criminal damage and harassment. He was bailed, with prohibitions on contacting Mrs W or her children, and on going to her work or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll