header-logo header-logo

19 June 2026
Issue: 8166 / Categories: Legal News , In Court , Criminal , Diversity
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Jury trial shake-up meets resistance

252772
© Getty images
Government plans to curb jury trials have received only qualified support from Parliament’s Justice Committee, which has raised serious concerns about the Courts and Tribunals Bill

Writing in NLJ this week, Michael Zander KC, NLJ columnist, examines a report that stops short of rejecting the reforms but recommends extensive amendments.

The committee doubts magistrates’ courts can absorb the additional workload, describing the government’s target of 21,000 magistrates by 2029 as unrealistic. It also questions proposals to remove defendants’ right to elect jury trial and to replace full rehearing appeals with narrower reviews.

The report highlights concerns about judge-only trials, retrospective application of reforms and the lack of appeal rights against allocation decisions. Particularly striking is its criticism of judicial diversity, noting that only 1% of Crown Court judges are Black. The committee calls this ‘shocking’ and urges a representative judiciary by 2035.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll