header-logo header-logo

20 March 2026
Issue: 8154 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Jury trial curbs risk ‘rough justice’

244927
Government plans to slash Crown Court delays by cutting jury trials face mounting criticism. In NLJ this week, Michael Zander KC warns proposals to shift cases to magistrates’ courts could ‘make the present very bad situation even worse’

The Courts & Tribunals Bill would remove defendants’ right to elect jury trial and expand judge-only hearings. But critics, including the Institute for Government, say the reforms rely on ‘highly uncertain’ assumptions about magistrates’ capacity. Already burdened courts may see workloads rise by up to 15%, risking delays and errors.

Zander highlights fears of ‘rough justice’ as quicker, less resourced hearings replace jury scrutiny. While aimed at efficiency, the reforms raise a stark trade-off between speed and fairness—one that could reshape criminal justice profoundly. 

Issue: 8154 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , In Court , Tribunals
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll