header-logo header-logo

12 June 2026
Issue: 8165 / Categories: Legal News , Food law , Marketing , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Junk food rules serve up a regulatory feast

252155
© Getty images
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced

Writing in NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood and Paul Hilder of Mills & Reeve explore the Advertising Standards Agency’s first rulings under the UK’s new restrictions on advertising ‘less healthy’ foods.

A Lidl Northern Ireland influencer campaign fell foul of the rules because viewers could identify a pain suisse and cheese pretzel, while a German Doner Kebab promotion survived because none of the featured products met the legal definition of junk food.

The article delves into the Department of Health’s nutrient profiling model, which scores foods according to factors such as sugar, salt and fibre. As the authors note, the answer to whether it is ‘pastries bad, kebabs ok?’ is simply: ‘it depends’. For brands, the lesson is clear—understanding the distinction between brand and product advertising could be crucial to avoiding reputational damage and regulatory action.

Issue: 8165 / Categories: Legal News , Food law , Marketing , Regulatory
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll