header-logo header-logo

09 August 2024
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: House of firsts

185057

With hundreds of newbies occupying the green benches, Westminster has been treated to a torrent of maiden speeches

In this week’s NLJ, Neil Parpworth, of Leicester De Montfort Law School, writes: ‘This influx of new faces has meant that already, maiden speeches are consuming a precious commodity: parliamentary time.’

Given more than half of all MPs are new, is this quaint tradition worth continuing? Can every single one of them really make a maiden speech?

Parpworth sets out the rules according to Erskine May, and observes sharp differences in approach among MPs.

Issue: 8083 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll