header-logo header-logo

09 August 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8083 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Point of order

185057
Neil Parpworth on why maiden speeches in the House of Commons are a continuing unnecessary distraction

The principal point to note about the 4 July 2024 general election result was, of course, the scale of the Labour Party’s victory at the polls, in terms of the number of seats won. Few would have predicted back in mid-December 2019, when the last general election was held, that the political pendulum would swing so far from right to left in such a short space of time.

A further point, which has also received media attention, is that more than half of the 650 members of the House of Commons are new to Parliament. While some change was inevitable, given that more than 100 sitting MPs chose not to stand in the election, the scale of the change is far greater than in 2015, for example, when 177 new MPs were elected. This influx of new faces has meant that already, maiden speeches are consuming a precious commodity: parliamentary time.

The opportunity

Erskine May is quite brief in its treatment of the subject. It explains

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll