header-logo header-logo

03 October 2025
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Legal News , Housing , Discrimination , Local authority , Equality
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Court backs Tower Hamlets database in discrimination claim

231389
Writing in NLJ this week, Kelvin Rutledge KC of Cornerstone Barristers and Genevieve Screeche-Powell of Field Court Chambers examine the Court of Appeal’s rejection of a discrimination challenge to Tower Hamlets’ housing database

The system, designed to allocate scarce housing efficiently, was attacked by Anisa Begum, a single mother who argued it placed women at a particular disadvantage, relying on statistical evidence. Shelter intervened in support.

Both the High Court and Court of Appeal disagreed, finding the database was not a ‘deferral list’ and did not itself cause disadvantage: men and women in unsuitable accommodation were ‘in the same boat’. Lord Justice Lewis stressed that causation, not correlation, was key, and that the real issue was shortage of supply, not database design.

The judgment is likely to attract attention from other housing authorities as a lawful model for managing acute demand under equality law.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll