header-logo header-logo

No discrimination by database

231389
A council’s database for homeless applicants was found not to be discriminatory against women, write Kelvin Rutledge KC & Genevieve Screeche-Powell

  • Tower Hamlets Council has sought to tackle the housing crisis by using a database to help it allocate housing to homeless applicants.
  • In Anisa Begum v London Borough of Tower Hamlets, the appellant claimed the use of the database discriminated unlawfully against her as a woman.
  • The court accepted Tower Hamlets Council’s submission that the database was not a deferral list or otherwise a means of delaying performance of the main housing duty.

In Alibkhiet v Brent London Borough; Adam v City of Westminster [2018] EWCA Civ 2742, Lord Justice Lewison famously remarked: ‘You would need to be a hermit not to know that there is an acute shortage of housing, especially affordable housing, in London; and that local government finance is severely stretched.’ That observation is especially true of family-sized temporary accommodation, which local housing authorities frequently need to discharge their ‘main’ duty to homeless households under s 193(2)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll