header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Cohabitation rights are not for everyone

218612
Law reform to give more rights to cohabiting couples has been on the campaign agenda for a long time, but is a blanket approach best? In this week’s NLJ, Caroline Bowden, consultant at Anthony Gold, looks at the difference between couples who have chosen not to legally regulate their relationship, and those where one partner has economic power and the other does not.

Bowden suggests introducing legal provisions to protect vulnerable cohabitees, rather than giving the same rights to everyone, whether they want them or not.

She writes: ‘Creating cohabitation laws by passage of time, or by contracting in or out, would be too much social change for many to stomach. Making it a better safety-net provision would avoid the arguments over personal autonomy, as well as prevent the predictable negative steps that the dominant partner would take to circumvent them anyway.’ 
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll