header-logo header-logo

16 May 2025 / Caroline Bowden
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Cohabitees: crafted or shafted?

218612
Caroline Bowden sets out the need for cohabitation reform—for some couples but not others
  • This article discusses the need for law reform to protect vulnerable cohabitees, particularly women, who are economically disadvantaged in cohabiting relationships.
  • It differentiates between crafted couples, who choose not to legally regulate their relationship, and shafted couples, in which one partner is economically dominant.
  • It suggests new legal provisions to better protect vulnerable cohabitees.

Why cohabit? All couples are now free to marry and all couples are now free to enter a civil partnership. Should there be law reform for couples who choose not to commit to either?

That question has already been answered. The government’s pre-election manifesto pledged to ‘strengthen the rights and protections available to women in cohabiting couples’.

Why just women? What about same-sex couples, or when the male cohabitee takes on the main parenting role? While the law is sure to cover these situations, the government has framed the problem around the most common stereotype: a more financially powerful man/father and his more economically dependent woman/mother cohabitee. This article is mainly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll