header-logo header-logo

07 February 2025
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-detail

NLJ this week: Apprenticeship funding cuts will have detrimental impact on profession

207256
The government is considering cutting funding for level 7 apprenticeships, which could ‘seriously impact social mobility in the legal profession’, Rhicha Kapila, partner and chief operating officer at Bolt Burdon Kemp, writes in this week’s NLJ. Level 7, the highest level of apprenticeships, ‘create a qualification path for graduates’ that allows them to be paid while they train.

Kapila writes that her firm currently has four level 7 apprentices, and was looking to expand its number of apprentices in coming years.

Kapila writes: ‘There are concerns that removing the option will close doors for people who would struggle to enter the legal profession via the usual academic route.’ 

Kapila's timely article coincides with National Apprenticeship Week, taking place from 10 to 16 February 2025.

Issue: 8103 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Career focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll