header-logo header-logo

An end to earning while learning?

07 February 2025 / Rhicha Kapila
Issue: 8103 / Categories: Opinion , Profession , Diversity , Career focus , Training & education
printer mail-detail
207256
Cutting apprenticeships is a step backwards for the profession & for social mobility, says Rhicha Kapila

National Apprenticeship Week (running from 10 to 16 February) should be something for us all to celebrate, however, the government is currently rethinking its funding for level 7 apprenticeships, which has the potential to seriously impact social mobility in the legal profession. Launched in 2016, the level 7 (higher or professional) apprenticeships create a qualification path for graduates that is the highest level of apprenticeship in the UK. Apprentices spend 80% of their time working for their employer, and the rest of their time working towards their level 7 qualification through a training provider. How this route differs from many others into the legal profession is that the apprentice is paid, and they don’t have to pay for training.

City Century, a collaboration of 50-plus City of London law firms, was launched in 2022 to help promote these apprenticeships. It described the path as ‘a debt-free option where students can earn while they learn. Our goal is simple yet ground-breaking: to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll