header-logo header-logo

03 April 2020
Issue: 7882 / Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

NLJ PROFILE: Ryan Whelan

Ryan Whelan, the 2020 LexisNexis Legal Personality of the Year, pays tribute to Emirates, brilliant mentors and inspirational figures including his former client Gina Martin & his son Ralph

What was your route into the profession?

Read law at Aberdeen University before training with Pinsent Masons. Joined Gibson Dunn almost a year after qualifying. I have been with the firm six years and work in the arbitration team from our London and Dubai offices.

What has been your biggest career challenge so far?

Juggling extensive travel with other professional and family commitments can be difficult. I owe a great deal to Emirates and their route network. For many years they’ve made sure that I’ve not had to miss an occasion or otherwise let anyone down. More fundamentally, I think every lawyer finds it difficult, at least initially, to find their voice and way of lawyering. I was fortunate to have truly brilliant mentors, including Fraser McMillan, Brandon Nolan, Graham Lovett and Paul McBride QC.

Which person within the legal profession inspires you most?

Our profession has so many inspirational figures that I find it hard to restrict myself to one. Hopefully you’ll allow me three.

  • First, for her talent, humility and approachability, Lady Hale.
  • Second, for being a master of written and oral advocacy, Sir James Eadie QC.
  • Third, for her passion, tenacity and eloquence, the Secret Barrister (who yes, I suspect, is female).

And these are just the three lawyers that spring to mind as having immediate name recognition; I really could go on… and then I’d definitely distort this question further by mentioning my former client Gina Martin. She may not be a qualified lawyer but she is a tremendous advocate, and an example to us all in terms of what it means to be brave and stoic.  

If you weren’t a lawyer, what would you choose as an alternate career?

Without a moment’s hesitation, I’d choose to be a billionaire philanthropist. Failing that, filmmaker. Having that platform and creative freedom would be an extraordinary privilege. I’d focus on producing thought pieces but, under the veneer of showing versatility, I’d dabble in Richard Cutis-esque romantic comedies. In terms of style, think Steven Spielberg meets Louis Theroux but with a hint of non-linear Tarantino.

Who is your favourite fictional lawyer?

Fred Gailey from Miracle on 34th Street: he was creative, tactical and persuasive in the highest of high stake litigations, what’s not to love?

What change would you make to the profession?

I’d improve legal aid remuneration. Legal aid is an investment. Public confidence in justice, the rule of law and society itself depends on having intelligent lawyers working on legal aid cases to ensure voices are heard and decisions tested. Our legal aid lawyers should not have to be self-sacrificing. We as a society should pay them fairly for the work that they do, the contribution that they make. 

How do you relax?

Laughing with family and friends, ideally over good food and with my son Ralph chairing proceedings from his high chair. Less frequently, while at the gym, playing football or being beaten by my wife at tennis—there’s no chivalry involved in my defeats, she’s just far better than I am! 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll