header-logo header-logo

28 September 2017 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7763 / Categories: Features , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

NLJ costs revision course (Pt 2)

nlj_7763_regan

This week, Dominic Regan addresses estimates & revisits the problem of incurred costs

  • A costs management order is always predicated upon the standard basis.
  • Merrix and Harrison show courts cannot depart from the agreed figure for estimated costs without good reason.
  • What to do about incurred costs is a lingering issue in costs management.

Budgeting is brilliant except when it isn’t. The concept whereby the proposed spend of each party is scrutinised at the outset is sound. Grandiose spending plans can be slapped down before the money is spent, before the damage is done.

In Merrix v Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust [2017] 1 Costs LR 91 the crucial issue was the relationship between an approved budget at the outset and a detailed assessment at the conclusion of the same action. The defendant asserted that, while relevant, a budget was not conclusive and so a full blown detailed assessment remained essential. The receiving party understandably argued that, since it had come in on budget, that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll