header-logo header-logo

12 December 2014 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , ADR
printer mail-detail

Nip it in the bud

Dispute resolution is dead, long live dispute avoidance, says Martin Burns

More and more government and industry bodies are seeking to reduce legal costs associated with resolving disputes by using a range of early intervention techniques. These are designed to help contracting parties avoid disputes by managing commercial relationships through difficult situations, and preventing minor issues escalating into full blown disputes.

Early intervention

Arbitration, adjudication, and other traditional forms of dispute resolution are usually employed only after legal costs have been racked up, commercial relationships have been damaged and party positions have become entrenched. Early intervention techniques, on the other hand, can help to manage conflicts and nip disputes in the bud. This can mean the difference between good business driven by good business relationships, and no business at all.

The reality to commercial relationships is that conflict is always possible. Early intervention addresses this by involving contracting parties in establishing, at an early stage, how their disagreements will be handled. The objective is to focus minds on how potential problems will be resolved, and doing it early enough to avoid the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll