header-logo header-logo

12 December 2014 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Features , ADR
printer mail-detail

Nip it in the bud

Dispute resolution is dead, long live dispute avoidance, says Martin Burns

More and more government and industry bodies are seeking to reduce legal costs associated with resolving disputes by using a range of early intervention techniques. These are designed to help contracting parties avoid disputes by managing commercial relationships through difficult situations, and preventing minor issues escalating into full blown disputes.

Early intervention

Arbitration, adjudication, and other traditional forms of dispute resolution are usually employed only after legal costs have been racked up, commercial relationships have been damaged and party positions have become entrenched. Early intervention techniques, on the other hand, can help to manage conflicts and nip disputes in the bud. This can mean the difference between good business driven by good business relationships, and no business at all.

The reality to commercial relationships is that conflict is always possible. Early intervention addresses this by involving contracting parties in establishing, at an early stage, how their disagreements will be handled. The objective is to focus minds on how potential problems will be resolved, and doing it early enough to avoid the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll