header-logo header-logo

29 September 2016 / Patrick Allen
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

A Nightmare on Claimant Street

Fixed costs are unfair and unjust to claimants, says Patrick Allen

Fixed costs for claims up to £250,000 will cause substantial disadvantage to individuals who bring claims and bring an undeserved windfall to insurers and corporate defendants.

The backers of fixed costs (including Lord Justice Jackson, the government and insurers) suggest that they will bring certainty to the system to make it proportionate and predictable.

But it is not so simple. Litigation is not a fair fight between equally resourced players but a war between two very unequal parties.

Statistics confirm that most claimants are individual citizens of modest means (the median gross earnings for all employees in 2014 was £22,044, pensioners, children and the disabled, who will also be claimants, earned much less) and the defendant is usually local or central government, the police, a large corporate body or an insured person. As a consequence, most defendants have the backing of considerable wealth and resources.

This is shown by the fact that:

  • About 1.5 million claims are issued each year.
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll