header-logo header-logo

22 February 2023
Issue: 8014 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Covid-19 , Human rights , Diversity , Defamation
printer mail-detail

Nightingale Courts & Labour pledges

Lawyers have welcomed plans to keep 24 Nightingale Courts open for another year, but warned more was needed to tackle the backlog of cases.

‘We know there are already Nightingale Courts sitting empty due to a lack of judges,’ Law Society president Lubna Shuja said.

‘The most pressing issue is there are not enough lawyers, court staff or judges to cover all the outstanding cases. Long-term investment is needed across the whole criminal justice system to remedy this.’

The Ministry of Justice said the crown court backlog had peaked at 62,000 in October 2022 during the strike action by the Criminal Bar, but fell by nearly 800 cases during the final two months of the year.

Bar Council chair Nick Vineall KC said keeping the courts open would help maintain capacity levels. However, he warned: ‘The large backlogs in court cases existed before the COVID pandemic and tackling it requires increased investment and increased capacity.’

Last week, shadow justice secretary Steve Reed set out Labour’s priorities for the justice system, in a speech at Middle Temple.

Condemning the Lord Chancellor’s Bill of Rights as ‘a Rights Reduction Act’, Reed said a Labour government would protect both the Human Rights Act and the UK’s European Convention on Human Rights membership, and could bring in new rights, for example, to clean air or adequate health care.

He said he would increase the number of crown prosecutors by 50% by allowing associate prosecutors to take on a bigger role, and would open specialist courts in order to speed up and prioritise the prosecution of rape cases.

On judicial diversity, Reed said he supported extending non-traditional routes to the judiciary, which could see more employed barristers and legal executives becoming judges.

He pledged a clampdown on SLAPPs (strategic lawsuits against public participation), with ‘tough penalties against abusive litigation’ and protection against excessive costs. Last week, the Solicitors Regulation Authority revealed it currently has 40 live investigations linked to SLAPPs, and warned that concerns about abusive litigation such as potentially ruinous but unmerited defamation proceedings have increased since the invasion of Ukraine.

Vineall KC said the proposals were ‘interesting’ and he looked forward to further discussions.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll