header-logo header-logo

22 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New balance of power

SRA report City firms are under increased pressure from clients

City law firms are under acute pressure from clients over pricing and terms of engagement, new research has shown.

The balance of power between client and lawyer has shifted, according to an independent study commissioned by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Independence, risk and representation: An Empirical Exploration of the Management of Client Relationships by Large Law Firms. However, firms that resist terms of engagement that they find unacceptable will still find work.

During interviews with senior corporate lawyers from 20 of the largest firms, undertaken by the University of Birmingham and Claire Legal Ltd, about three-quarters of interviewees outlined scenarios where they were forced to accept onerous terms of engagement with little room for discussion on fees, conflict of interest requirements and IT security.

Clients are restricting via contract who a firm can or cannot work for, raising access to representation issues.

The report states: “Of most concern are claims from some lawyers that these contractual provisions might be used strategically by some clients to deny claimants representation from a tier of firms. It was suggested to us by a minority of our interviewees that law firms may be appointed to those panels, and made to sign ‘no sue’ clauses, where the client has little or no intention of giving that firm work.” While the report’s authors suggest that further research is needed to substantiate these claims, they describe them as “alarming”.

Crispin Passmore, SRA executive director for policy, says the increased pressure makes it “all the more important that the professional principles of independence and ethical practices remain at the heart of solicitors’ decision-making”.

Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll