header-logo header-logo

Neurotechnology & the law: intellectual property

242553

Neurotechnology is advancing at breakneck speed—but can existing patent law keep up? Larissa Bifano, Rebecca Lawrence & Harry Lambert examine the IP challenges facing innovators in the UK & US

  • Neurotechnology innovation increasingly depends on AI-driven data processing, raising significant challenges under patent law exclusions for software, mathematical methods, and diagnostic or surgical techniques.
  • UK and US patent regimes take different approaches to subject-matter eligibility, inventorship, and technical effect, requiring carefully tailored patent strategies for transatlantic protection.

Neurotechnology continues to advance with increasing sophistication, striving for less invasive interfaces and more precise interaction with the nervous system. However, the efficacy of these devices increasingly depends on how they handle the high-dimensional, noisy data they record.

Innovators are turning to rapidly advancing artificial intelligence (AI) to decode these signals and enable closed-loop control. This reliance on software and algorithms brings the field into direct collision with patent regimes in the UK and US, which maintain strict exclusions for computer programs and mathematical methods. Navigating these exclusions is now critical for protecting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll