header-logo header-logo

Neurotechnology & the law: employment

220705
Are we approaching a new frontier for employee monitoring? Harry Lambert & Josh Neaman examine how developments in neurotechnology might impact upon legal rights in the workplace
  • The article examines how the integration of neurotechnology, such as wearable brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), in the workplace creates challenges for existing employment law, particularly in relation to unfair dismissal and discrimination.
  • Both overt and covert monitoring using BCIs may lead to claims of direct or indirect discrimination, especially when algorithmic biases affect the reliability of data used in managerial decisions.

This article (Part 8 of this special NLJ series) considers how the widespread adoption of neurotechnology in the workplace will impact upon the rights of employees. The focus is on two pillars of employment law: unfair dismissal and discrimination. We consider how the law in these areas may apply to various factual scenarios involving neurotechnology at work, and analyse whether, to what extent and where the current framework, borne of an analogue age, may be ill equipped for the age of neurotechnology.

Unfair dismissal

Individuals

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll