header-logo header-logo

09 September 2011 / Jennifer Lee
Issue: 7480 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Much obliged

Jennifer Lee assesses the level of obligation owed by employers to former employees

The recent case of McKie v Swindon College [2011] EWHC 469 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 128 (May) has extended the obligations owed by a former employer to a former employee when commenting on his performance. The case did not concern comments made in a reference, but rather in an e-mail sent six years after the former employee had left his employment.

Obligations to former employees

Case law had, until recently, been limited to establishing that an employer owed a duty of care in providing a reference about an employee or former employee where it was foreseeable that any information provided would be relied upon by a prospective employer and, therefore, potentially cause loss to that employee. If the employer breaches that duty and the employee suffers economic loss as a result, he can claim damages either for negligent misstatement or breach of contract.

This principle derives from the House of Lords’ decision in Spring v Guardian Assurance plc [1995] 2 AC 296, [1994] 3 All ER 129,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll