header-logo header-logo

30 March 2012 / Toby Craig
Issue: 7507 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Moving forward?

The government has failed in its attempt to promote fairer, quicker & cheaper justice, says Toby Craig

It seems far longer than 16 months since the government published its consultation documents on the reform of legal aid and civil litigation in November 2010. At that stage, it was clear that change was in the pipeline, but we had little idea of how it would present itself legislatively. As we now near the end of that legislative process, it seems an opportune moment to look back over an extended period of lobbying and engagement, during which a host of campaign groups sought to provide a voice for the many women, children and vulnerable people who will lose out from these reforms.

After numerous and wide-ranging consultation responses were received and duly ignored, the government published its own response last June, simultaneously giving the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill (or LASPO, the short-hand which is all too familiar to many battle-weary opponents) its first reading in the House of Commons. The Bill is split into three Parts: the first deals with legal aid

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll