header-logo header-logo

Modern moneylending & misery

192559
Secured loans based on sham authorisation: Fred Philpott explains the shady world of illegal lending
  • Analysis of cases that have dealt with unauthorised secured loans, setting out the strategies often used, and the consequences for both lenders and borrowers.

Over recent years, a financial industry has operated whereby some businesses lend money secured on people’s homes without authorisation. A recent Court of Appeal case illustrates some of the subterfuges that can be used.

The background

The Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) introduced a scheme of authorisation which was required lawfully to carry out certain financial services activities including, in general terms, granting credit secured on domestic property resulting in a regulated mortgage contract (see the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001 (SI 2001/544) (RAO 2001), art 61).

The origin of requiring official approval (registration) to grant credit is to be found in the Moneylenders Act 1900. These provisions were replaced by the Moneylenders Act 1927, which provided for a scheme of licensing for moneylenders the grant of which depended on having a certificate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll