header-logo header-logo

21 March 2013
Issue: 7553 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Mills & Reeve

New HQ in Cambridge

National law firm Mills & Reeve has moved into a prestigious new headquarters in Cambridge after the completion of a £2.45m office fit out by Overbury.

More than 300 employees have transferred activities to the new offices at Botanic House—a new landmark building on Hills Road.

The seven-storey office development stands between the city’s historic core and the train station. The 60,000 sq ft lens-shaped property, designed by Formation Architects, overlooks Cambridge University’s Botanic Garden.

Ian Mather, partner and head of the Cambridge office for Mills & Reeve, says: “This move demonstrates Mills & Reeve’s commitment to both Cambridge and the wider region.”

Issue: 7553 / Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll