header-logo header-logo

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Men at the Bar earn more

Women barristers earn one third less than their male colleagues, Bar Council analysis has found.

Moreover, the earnings gap increased in certain practice areas. In immigration, earnings decreased overall and the gap widened from 33% to 38% in 2021. In contentious chancery, earnings rose overall, but women earned 39% less than men (compared to 38% less in 2020). In personal injury, fee income decreased overall, and women earned 53% less than men (52% in 2020).

However, earnings gender equality improved among those practising in commercial and financial services law (from a 57% gap to 51%), in crime (from 38% to 35%) and in employment law (from 16% to 6%).

Conversely, women barristers earn more than men in only two areas—defamation (women earn 36% more) and family (children) (women have always out-earned men in this area and earned 3% more in 2021). However, men out-earned women by 43% in family (other).

The data is taken from the Bar Council’s report, published last week, ‘Barrister earnings by sex and practice area: 2022 update’, and shows the gap between men and women’s earnings overall has reduced from 39% in 2020 to 34% in 2021. This was due to men earning 5% less and women 6% more, which may be an anomaly caused by the pandemic.

The report is compiled using anonymous income data from self-employed barristers shared by Bar Mutual Insurance Fund during the professional insurance renewal process.

Chair of the Bar Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘This year’s data analysis shows there remains a long way to go to close the earnings gap, particularly in the higher earning practice areas.

‘Through the Bar Council’s modernising the Bar programme we are focused on evidence-based and practical actions to tackle inequalities at the Bar. Chambers can make a significant difference through ensuring fair distribution of work, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities, and support for new barristers and those returning to the Bar.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll