header-logo header-logo

02 November 2022
Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Men at the Bar earn more

Women barristers earn one third less than their male colleagues, Bar Council analysis has found.

Moreover, the earnings gap increased in certain practice areas. In immigration, earnings decreased overall and the gap widened from 33% to 38% in 2021. In contentious chancery, earnings rose overall, but women earned 39% less than men (compared to 38% less in 2020). In personal injury, fee income decreased overall, and women earned 53% less than men (52% in 2020).

However, earnings gender equality improved among those practising in commercial and financial services law (from a 57% gap to 51%), in crime (from 38% to 35%) and in employment law (from 16% to 6%).

Conversely, women barristers earn more than men in only two areas—defamation (women earn 36% more) and family (children) (women have always out-earned men in this area and earned 3% more in 2021). However, men out-earned women by 43% in family (other).

The data is taken from the Bar Council’s report, published last week, ‘Barrister earnings by sex and practice area: 2022 update’, and shows the gap between men and women’s earnings overall has reduced from 39% in 2020 to 34% in 2021. This was due to men earning 5% less and women 6% more, which may be an anomaly caused by the pandemic.

The report is compiled using anonymous income data from self-employed barristers shared by Bar Mutual Insurance Fund during the professional insurance renewal process.

Chair of the Bar Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘This year’s data analysis shows there remains a long way to go to close the earnings gap, particularly in the higher earning practice areas.

‘Through the Bar Council’s modernising the Bar programme we are focused on evidence-based and practical actions to tackle inequalities at the Bar. Chambers can make a significant difference through ensuring fair distribution of work, including briefing practices, marketing opportunities, and support for new barristers and those returning to the Bar.’

Issue: 8001 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll