header-logo header-logo

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-detail

Measuring progress on diversity

Nine out of ten chambers responding have adopted at least one recommendation from the Bar Council’s ‘Race at the Bar’ report last year, according to an interim progress survey.

Some 69 chambers and organisations representing 4,306 barristers responded to the survey. One third of these had taken action across all four priority areas highlighted in the report: access, retention, progression and culture.

Chambers identified a lack of people (62%) and a lack of time (61%) as the key challenges in tackling race inequality.

Just 8.7% of respondents reported not taking any action.

Bar chair Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘We want those who have taken action to help spread their good practice to support and collaborate with others.

‘And we want those who haven’t yet started to pick just one or two actions. The Bar Council is here to support chambers, organisations and individuals with information, training, and advice.’ The progress report and other resources are available here.

Meanwhile, research published last week by non-profit social equality consultancy the Bridge Group into the Judicial Diversity Forum (JDF) has highlighted a need to set targets and milestones. The JDF, which launched in 2015, is a collective of organisations such as the Bar Council, CILEX and the Legal Services Board (LSB).

The Bridge Group researchers found most JDF members believe it needs more clearly defined aims, more coordinated actions and more collaboration between member organisations. They proposed nine high-level goals for the JDF to monitor and evaluate progress, such as ensuring that ‘at each level of the judiciary, the judiciary better reflects the society it serves’.

The researchers also suggested the JDF adopt specific and measurable descriptions of the changes it wants to achieve, and change its action plan to include group rather than individual initiatives.

Matthew Hill, chief executive of the LSB, said the JDF would incorporate the recommendations into its actions and priorities.

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll