header-logo header-logo

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-detail

Measuring progress on diversity

Nine out of ten chambers responding have adopted at least one recommendation from the Bar Council’s ‘Race at the Bar’ report last year, according to an interim progress survey.

Some 69 chambers and organisations representing 4,306 barristers responded to the survey. One third of these had taken action across all four priority areas highlighted in the report: access, retention, progression and culture.

Chambers identified a lack of people (62%) and a lack of time (61%) as the key challenges in tackling race inequality.

Just 8.7% of respondents reported not taking any action.

Bar chair Mark Fenhalls KC said: ‘We want those who have taken action to help spread their good practice to support and collaborate with others.

‘And we want those who haven’t yet started to pick just one or two actions. The Bar Council is here to support chambers, organisations and individuals with information, training, and advice.’ The progress report and other resources are available here.

Meanwhile, research published last week by non-profit social equality consultancy the Bridge Group into the Judicial Diversity Forum (JDF) has highlighted a need to set targets and milestones. The JDF, which launched in 2015, is a collective of organisations such as the Bar Council, CILEX and the Legal Services Board (LSB).

The Bridge Group researchers found most JDF members believe it needs more clearly defined aims, more coordinated actions and more collaboration between member organisations. They proposed nine high-level goals for the JDF to monitor and evaluate progress, such as ensuring that ‘at each level of the judiciary, the judiciary better reflects the society it serves’.

The researchers also suggested the JDF adopt specific and measurable descriptions of the changes it wants to achieve, and change its action plan to include group rather than individual initiatives.

Matthew Hill, chief executive of the LSB, said the JDF would incorporate the recommendations into its actions and priorities.

Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Diversity , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll