header-logo header-logo

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Mass campaign against Mastercard

Representatives for Walter Merricks’s £17bn ‘opt-out’ claim against Mastercard have launched the biggest public noticing campaign in legal history.

A £600,000 print and digital advertising campaign targeting national, regional and social media channels will inform consumers of their rights under the claim, with about 46 million people potentially eligible for a pay-out of up to £300 each. The campaign launched last week, following the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of Mastercard’s final challenge to certification of collective proceedings, in Mastercard v Merricks [2022] EWCA Civ 1568.

The case, which is based on interchange fees paid by businesses when consumers paid by card, is the first to be brought under the collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Everyone within the scope of the claim is automatically included unless they specifically opt out.

Former financial ombudsman Merricks said: ‘Even if you didn’t use a Mastercard and just paid for things by cash, cheque or a different card, you can still benefit from my claim.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll