header-logo header-logo

12 December 2022
Issue: 8007 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Competition , Compensation
printer mail-detail

Mass campaign against Mastercard

Representatives for Walter Merricks’s £17bn ‘opt-out’ claim against Mastercard have launched the biggest public noticing campaign in legal history.

A £600,000 print and digital advertising campaign targeting national, regional and social media channels will inform consumers of their rights under the claim, with about 46 million people potentially eligible for a pay-out of up to £300 each. The campaign launched last week, following the Court of Appeal’s dismissal of Mastercard’s final challenge to certification of collective proceedings, in Mastercard v Merricks [2022] EWCA Civ 1568.

The case, which is based on interchange fees paid by businesses when consumers paid by card, is the first to be brought under the collective action regime introduced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. Everyone within the scope of the claim is automatically included unless they specifically opt out.

Former financial ombudsman Merricks said: ‘Even if you didn’t use a Mastercard and just paid for things by cash, cheque or a different card, you can still benefit from my claim.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll