header-logo header-logo

07 December 2022
Issue: 8006 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Competition
printer mail-detail

Mastercard loses latest appeal against opt-out class action

Mastercard has lost its latest appeal against the Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) decision to certify an ‘opt-out’ class action.

The Court of Appeal’s unanimous dismissal means about three million people who died between September 2016 when the claim was filed and August 2021 when the CAT certified the claim will be succeeded by representatives of their estate. Individuals who have died since August 2021 will also be succeeded, but this was not an issue in the appeal.

The pioneering billion-pound class action is being brought by personal finance campaigner Walter Merricks over multilateral interchange fees charged by Mastercard.

Boris Bronfentrinker, partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, representing Merricks, said the judgment in Mastercard v Merricks [2022] EWCA Civ 1568 ‘finally brings to an end the battle to get the collective proceedings certified, a battle that started over six years ago. The scope of the class represented by Mr Merricks is now settled’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll