header-logo header-logo

15 April 2026
Issue: 8157 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Online safety , Social Media , Liability , Compliance , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Making tech execs criminally liable

The government has warned tech executives that they may face personal criminal liability where their platforms fail to remove non-consensual intimate images within 48 hours

The reform is one of several government amendments tabled to the Crime and Policing Bill last week. Corker Binning partner Henrietta Ronson said it marked ‘a significant step.

‘It shifts the burden away from victims onto those with operational control which is likely to drive faster and more robust compliance. However, many of the relevant decision makers are based outside the UK and territorial jurisdiction and enforceability will constrain reach.

‘Its practical impact will be limited and the measure if passed may be more symbolic than substantive.’

Other amendments tackle pornography featuring incestuous conduct and pornography where an adult roleplays as a child, punishable by up to five years in prison.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll