header-logo header-logo

Is social media a defective product? Pt 3

21 November 2025 / Harry Lambert
Issue: 8140 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology , Social Media , Liability , Mental health
printer mail-detail
236032
Could tortious liability be the only tool to make Big Tech pay for the psychological harms stemming from social media use? Harry Lambert issues a call to arms
  • Social media platforms intentionally create and normalise addiction through algorithms engineered to exploit users’ emotional and neurological vulnerabilities.
  • The article argues that tortious liability should extend to social media companies, as their deliberate design choices foreseeably cause psychological harm—including addiction, depression, sexploitation and body dysmorphia—while generating profit from those very harms.

Example 1: Addiction

Companies do morally dubious things every day, but there is no tort of being ‘dastardly’. So the first question we need to tackle head-on is why tortious liability should exist at all. In other words, why does making an addictive social media platform attract liability, in a way that (say) making an addictive cigarette or a gambling platform—or even, for that matter, a delicious chocolate bar—does not?

Each comparison helps us tease out the legally and morally relevant features at play.

Starting with chocolate: ultimately, however delicious—and however many additives

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll