header-logo header-logo

04 July 2025 / Tom Franklin
Issue: 8123 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Magistrates matter

224745
The volunteer judiciary has faced neglect. Tom Franklin explains why addressing this is important—for all parts of the legal system

Most readers of the New Law Journal will need little reminding that our justice system has, for too long, operated on goodwill stretched to breaking point. The strain on criminal legal aid, the crisis in court maintenance, the exodus from the Crown Prosecution Service and private defence practice—none of this is news to solicitors and barristers. What is perhaps less widely discussed, though, is that magistrates—the volunteer judiciary who hear over 90% of criminal cases—have faced similar neglect, while helping to prop up an overstretched system.

The ‘Magistrates Matter’ report, recently published by the Magistrates’ Association, the only membership body and independent voice for magistrates, does not ask for miracles. It sets out seven practical, modest recommendations to recognise and retain this vital volunteer force—and to help ensure that the courts they serve are resilient, effective and trusted by the public. These recommendations cost little in the scheme of things, but their impact could be considerable.

The human factor

Magistrates are

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll