header-logo header-logo

09 February 2017 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7733 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Low Society?

nlj_7733_robins

Jon Robins reports on the latest crisis to hit Chancery Lane

It’s been a shambolic start to the new year at Chancery Lane. “The Law Society’s governance is costly, bureaucratic and does not reflect how successful modern organisations operate,” wrote outgoing chief exec Catherine Dixon in her blistering resignation letter.

Appearing in unedited form in the Gazette on the first working day of the year, it must have left an extraordinary impression on those practice fee paying solicitors not familiar with the internal workings of their representative body. “The Law Society, in my view cannot, because of its current governance arrangements, operate in a responsive and agile way,” continued the chief exec.

Dixon, who was only appointed chief exec in August 2014, reckoned it was “impossible, as an effective CEO, to navigate the complex and often overlapping boards in a way which best serves the organisation and its members”.

The council comprises 100 solicitors, almost two-third represents parts of the country and the rest cover practice areas and demographic groups. There are four boards covering management, legal affairs and policy, membership and regulatory affairs.

Catherine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll