header-logo header-logo

Look out litigants!

Are litigants the latest victims of the government’s austerity measures, asks Georgina Squire

Almost two years since the Jackson reforms, the effects of the new regime are still unfolding. 2014 will be remembered by many as the year the Court of Appeal clarified Mitchell, ending the flood of pre-emptive applications (lest we be in breach!) and helping litigators sleep easier at night. However, we have yet to see the full impact of the Jackson reforms. With 2015 already presenting further challenges to litigators, we continue to attempt to navigate Jackson’s brave new world. So, five months into 2015, what developments should litigators be alive to? 

Courts, forms & procedure

As we know, in 2014, the rules changed so that only claims in excess of £100,000 could be issued in the High Court, leading to a lot of cases being transferred to the county courts. We are seeing many claims well in excess of the £100,000 threshold being transferred to the county court. All county court claims are now processed by a central management system in Salford (the County Court Money Claims Centre

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll