header-logo header-logo

Line up

10094385_4

Ian Smith observes the plight of those seeking justice in employment tribunals

The cases commented on in this epistle are particularly diverse, and served to amuse those of us still at the coalface rather than in Tuscany during the dog days of the last month. The first concerns whistleblowing (in the context of human rights) and the second is another equal pay case making the point that ultimately the Equal Pay Act 1970 (EPA 1970) is there to secure equal pay, not fair wages (though in an unusual manner). The third and fourth cases illustrate the fundamental truth that you can go for years without a decision on a particular statutory provision and then suddenly have it brought back into focus.

Whistleblowing

Heinisch v Germany (App No 28274/08) concerned the potential application of Art 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) to a case of what in this jurisdiction would be considered whistleblowing. A geriatric nurse had made several complaints to the management about poor care standards and staff shortages. These were eventually backed by

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll