header-logo header-logo

22 January 2009 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7353 / Categories: Features , Public , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

A licence to govern

Unpopular but not unlawful. Nicholas Dobson gives the court’s verdict on the hike in child care court fees

Last year’s dramatic hike in court fees for public law child care and placement order applications was brought in to achieve the simple policy objective of fixing fees to reflect the true cost of these applications. But the breathtaking increases (which saw child care applications rising from £150 to £4,825 and those for placement orders from £100 to £400) attracted some sustained public law bombardment from four local authorities in judicial review proceedings brought against the lord chancellor and the secretary of state for communities and local government.

The authorities were London Borough of Hillingdon, Leeds and Liverpool City Councils and Norfolk County Council. They challenged the lawfulness of the court fee increases instituted by the Family Proceedings Fees Order 2008, (SI 2008/1054) and the Magistrates’ Courts Fees Order 2008 (SI 2008/1052). However, their combined firepower was ultimately unsuccessful, despite launching batteries of heavy ordnance loaded with warheads including: failure to consult on the principle; irrationality; discounting of a relevant consideration or decision made
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll