header-logo header-logo

Legal industry turns the tide

Profession remains resilient in the face of COVID-19

Litigation contracted by 21%, but the legal market as a whole shrank just 4.3% in 2020 after a strong bounce-back in the second half of the year, according to LexisNexis’ latest Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index report, supported by the Bar Council.

The detailed report, which tracks legal activity levels, gives a comprehensive insight into the impact of COVID-19 on the legal industry in 2020. It highlights the resilience of the profession as a whole―with employment, corporate, tax, risk and compliance and commercial all up on the previous year―but will concern lawyers in property, immigration, crime and litigation.

In litigation, civil fell furthest with a 35% drop in 2020―it is not possible to measure the backlog of civil cases. Criminal litigation fell 7.1% and the backlog of criminal cases reached a historic high, with many criminal barristers facing financial struggles due to lost earnings.

Employment litigation, on the other hand, rebounded―rising 14% in Q3 and 20% in Q4 compared to 2019. This was driven by several factors, including the redundancy rate, and employment tribunals increased their throughput of cases with remote trials. Family litigation was relatively stable, rising 9% in Q4.

In legal practice, commercial grew by 11% while risk and compliance work increased by 22% and employment rose by more than 6%. Competition work decreased by 10% as global trade and M&As declined. Immigration saw the sharpest fall with work reduced by 47%, followed by property.

The burden of navigating the pandemic has generated advisory work for lawyers, particularly in employment and tax. A boom in restructuring and insolvency work is anticipated but has not yet materialised―according to the report, demand in this practice area had fallen 18% at the end of 2020, perhaps due to government schemes propping up struggling businesses.

Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis and co-author of the report, said: ‘While it’s been a difficult year for the industry, the GLP Index demonstrates that many practice areas have bounced back as of Q4 2020.

‘The GLP Index help firms measure their growth against the market, see how they are performing and identify where to focus their efforts.’

Download the report here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll