header-logo header-logo

15 December 2022
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail

Lawyers seize the initiative on social mobility

Law firms performed strongly in the 2022 Social Mobility Employer Index, occupying more than one third of top 75 positions—including the number one spot.

The Index, published by charity the Social Mobility Foundation, analyses what employers are doing to improve social mobility and make their organisations more accessible and inclusive to individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (LSEBs). Measures are taken across eight area such as outreach work, numbers of graduates from outside the Russell Group, and removal of obstacles to progress for individuals lacking in access to money.

This year’s Index received 149 entries.

In the top spot was law firm Browne Jacobson, with accountancy, legal and professional services firms KPMG UK and PwC UK in third and fourth place, respectively. The top 20 included Herbert Smith Freehills (7), Baker McKenzie (8), Squire Patton Boggs (9), DLA Piper (12), Allen & Overy (13), Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (13), Linklaters (14), DWF (17), Lewis Silkin (18) and CMS (19).

Alan Milburn, chair of the Social Mobility Foundation, said: ‘The workplace is as important as the classroom in increasing social mobility.

‘Britain remains a deeply elitist nation where someone’s chances of getting a well-paid job in a top profession are still strongly correlated with their social background. However, several employers in financial and professional services, law, medicine, government, and the public sector have come to the realisation that a different mindset and a different set of processes are needed to make their intakes more representative of the public they serve. These employers are making these changes both because they see the social need to do so and because they recognise the business benefit that greater diversity can bring.

‘The Index is a celebration of those who are trying to tear down the barriers that stand in the way of too many able and aspirational youngsters getting a fair chance to succeed.’

The Index made 31 recommendations to help organisations improve social mobility and access, including paying travel and tech expenses for interview and application, making financial support available, monitoring the recruitment process to identify sticking points for LSEBs, recruiting for potential and seeking to avoid inherent biases such as ‘polish’, ‘fit’ or ‘culture’, developing an internal advocacy strategy on social mobility and encouraging employees to share their own social mobility stories.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll