header-logo header-logo

15 December 2022
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail

Lawyers seize the initiative on social mobility

Law firms performed strongly in the 2022 Social Mobility Employer Index, occupying more than one third of top 75 positions—including the number one spot.

The Index, published by charity the Social Mobility Foundation, analyses what employers are doing to improve social mobility and make their organisations more accessible and inclusive to individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds (LSEBs). Measures are taken across eight area such as outreach work, numbers of graduates from outside the Russell Group, and removal of obstacles to progress for individuals lacking in access to money.

This year’s Index received 149 entries.

In the top spot was law firm Browne Jacobson, with accountancy, legal and professional services firms KPMG UK and PwC UK in third and fourth place, respectively. The top 20 included Herbert Smith Freehills (7), Baker McKenzie (8), Squire Patton Boggs (9), DLA Piper (12), Allen & Overy (13), Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (13), Linklaters (14), DWF (17), Lewis Silkin (18) and CMS (19).

Alan Milburn, chair of the Social Mobility Foundation, said: ‘The workplace is as important as the classroom in increasing social mobility.

‘Britain remains a deeply elitist nation where someone’s chances of getting a well-paid job in a top profession are still strongly correlated with their social background. However, several employers in financial and professional services, law, medicine, government, and the public sector have come to the realisation that a different mindset and a different set of processes are needed to make their intakes more representative of the public they serve. These employers are making these changes both because they see the social need to do so and because they recognise the business benefit that greater diversity can bring.

‘The Index is a celebration of those who are trying to tear down the barriers that stand in the way of too many able and aspirational youngsters getting a fair chance to succeed.’

The Index made 31 recommendations to help organisations improve social mobility and access, including paying travel and tech expenses for interview and application, making financial support available, monitoring the recruitment process to identify sticking points for LSEBs, recruiting for potential and seeking to avoid inherent biases such as ‘polish’, ‘fit’ or ‘culture’, developing an internal advocacy strategy on social mobility and encouraging employees to share their own social mobility stories.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll