header-logo header-logo

29 September 2023
Issue: 8042 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 29 September 2023

Costs

International Game Technology PLC and other companies v Gambling Commission [2023] EWHC 2226 (TCC), [2023] All ER (D) 32 (Sep)

The Technology and Construction Court dismissed permission to appeal by the claimants’ (together, IGT) and made a cost order against them in favour of the defendant Gambling Commission (the Commission) and the interested parties (together, Allwyn). The preliminary issues had been decided in favour of the Commission and it had been concluded that IGT had no standing to challenge the Commission’s award to Allwyn of the licence to run the Fourth National Lottery. The present matter addressed consequential matters. It fell to be determined whether (i) the Commission should have been awarded its claim against IGT for the cost of the claims and for a payment on account of those costs; (ii) Allwyn should be granted an order that IGT should pay their costs and; (iii) IGT’s application for permission to appeal should be granted. The court held that (i) an amount had to be identified and paid on account rather than making the successful party wait for the completion

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll