header-logo header-logo

25 February 2022
Issue: 7968 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 25 February 2022

Human rights

AB (by the Official Solicitor, his litigation friend) v Worcestershire County Council and another [2022] EWHC 115 (QB), [2022] All ER (D) 76 (Jan)

The Queen’s Bench Division allowed the defendant councils’ application for summary judgment, and struck out the claim based on art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, in circumstances where the claimant had been abused by his mother while he had lived in the second defendant’s local authority area from 2005 to 2011, and the first defendant’s until 2016, but had not been made the subject of a care order until 2015. With regards to the strike out application, the claimant’s art 6 claim, that he had a civil right to be taken into care, disclosed no legally recognisable claim given that a child has no right to seek a care order or have one made in respect of their care. Only a local authority is empowered to make such an application and in doing so the authority is not acting on behalf of the child. In relation to the application for summary judgment, while

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll