header-logo header-logo

22 November 2024
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 22 November 2024

Criminal law

R (on the application of Michael John Harvey) v Luton and South Bedfordshire Magistrates Court [2024] EWHC 2832 (Admin)

The Magistrates’ Court has a duty under Rule 3(7) of the Magistrates’ Courts (Freezing and Forfeiture of Money in Bank and Building Society Accounts) Rules 2017 to serve a copy of any order made on an application under section 303Z1 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 on the person whose account is the subject of the application and the relevant financial institution. The requirement for public pronouncement of judgments under Art 6 ECHR is satisfied by formally notifying the person affected of the outcome, even if no substantive order is made. The Magistrates’ Court’s refusal to produce an order recording the outcome of the IP’s application on 20 January 2023 was irrational and disproportionate.


Family proceedings

Mrs W v Mr W and others [2024] EWHC 2849 (Fam)

The court made a Parental Order in respect of the child F, transferring legal parenthood from the surrogate (first respondent) to the applicants (intended parents Mr and Mrs W). The court

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll